Standing
Committee on
Fisheries and
Oceans
Comité
permanent des
pêches
et des
océans
|
HOUSE
OF COMMONS
CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES
OTTAWA, CANADA
|
Monday, May 17, 2004
The Honourable Geoff
Regan, P.C., M.P.
Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
200 Kent Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Dear Minister Regan:
I
am writing on behalf of the Standing Committee on Fisheries
and Oceans to ask you to ensure that a comprehensive environmental
impact analysis of sablefish aquaculture in British Columbia
be completed under the Canadian Environmental Assessment
Act, the Fisheries Act, or the Navigable Water
Protection Act before any commercial sablefish farming
operation is authorized to proceed.
On
May 11, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans heard
concerns from the Canadian Sablefish Association about sablefish
fish farming in British Columbia and its potential impact
on their industry, the international sablefish market, and
the sablefish stock. In the view of the Committee,
if nothing is done to provide assurances that there are
neither biological nor economic risks, we may witness the
destruction of yet another successful fishery.
The
federal government appears to support the development of
sablefish farming in British Columbia, which, according
to the former Commissioner for Aquaculture Development,
Mr. Yves Bastien, holds the same potential as that of Atlantic
cod in Newfoundland and Labrador. The government of
British Columbia has already issued several site licenses
for sablefish fish farming even though, according to the
Canadian Sablefish Association, the technology is not yet
commercially viable, a market has not been identified, no
environmental or economic studies have been done, and all
past attempts to farm sablefish have failed.
It
is the Committee’s understanding that your Department has
statutory obligations under the Canadian Environmental
Assessment Act as well as the Fisheries Act and
the Navigable Water Protection Act to ensure the
proper assessments are conducted before the approval of
any commercial sablefish farming operations.
Sablefish
is one of the most valuable species on Canada’s west coast.
Caution is warranted for at least three reasons. First,
the sablefish fishery is not only practised in British Columbia,
but also in the states of Washington and Alaska. The
stock, presently in relatively good shape, is highly migratory,
and therefore farming in British Columbia could affect not
only the Canadian sablefish fishery but also those of our
U.S. neighbours. This could easily become another
irritant in Canada-U.S. relations, not to say that it could
contravene the spirit of UNCLOS and UNFA, which implies
an obligation on states not to harm the fisheries of their
neighbours. Second, although sablefish is a deepwater
species, juveniles are known to spend their first two to
five years in inlets and coastal waters. The presence
of sablefish fish farms in these waters and the potential
transmission of diseases or parasites from net pens to the
juvenile population could damage the health of the wild
stock. Third, sablefish is exported mostly to markets
in Japan. However, this lucrative market is believed
to be near saturation, therefore any significant increase
in production risks a collapse of the market price.
The
Canadian Sablefish Association and the Department have historically
worked very well together. A collaborative agreement
between the two bodies provides for joint research, stock
assessment, management, and enforcement activities.
The stock assessment and related biological studies as well
as management and enforcement activities are funded entirely
by the sablefish fishery. A joint department and industry
body coordinates research. Indeed, you yourself recently,
before the Senate Committee on Fisheries and Oceans, described
the sablefish fishery as an example to follow in terms of
collaboration between your Department and the industry.
It
would appear, however, that the spirit of collaboration
is not consistent throughout your Department. The
representative from the Canadian Sablefish Association indicated
that the Association has been unable to communicate with
officials responsible for the aquaculture file at DFO, Pacific
Region.
The
Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans therefore supports
the Canadian Sablefish Association’s request that a comprehensive
environmental assessment be performed before any commercial
farming of sablefish is permitted. Given the past
contribution of the Association to stock assessment and
related biological studies, and therefore the body of expertise
it could contribute, and the fact that the Association is
a principal stakeholder, we also support their involvement
in performing these assessments.
Moreover, we would recommend that, in parallel to an environmental
assessment, the Department consider two related options:
1) controls on the exportation of the Canadian-developed
expertise and technology pertaining to sablefish aquaculture;
and 2) a moratorium on the exportation of live sablefish
adults or brood stock. These measures are, in our
view, essential to preserve the vitality or the very viability
of the sablefish fishery in Canada as well as in the U.S.