Mail on Sunday, 14th
December
I lost my girlfriend and
my career and almost lost my mind – because of a chemical
used in fish farms: Was the life of a bright young student
destroyed by poisons that were used every day in the mass
production of fish for human consumption?
By Fidelma Cook
[Photo: Fighting back:
after years of suffering without knowing the cause, James
Findlay is taking legal action over the fish farm incident
that he believes destroyed his health]
At 28, James Findlay thought
life couldn’t be sweeter. Quietly spoken with a
natural courtesy and charm he had acquired a growing reputation
as a knowledgeable and committed expert in fish management.
About to take up a post as a Government fisheries officer,
which guaranteed him a lifetime close to the sea and rivers
he loved, he had taken a temporary job as deputy manager
at a Highland company farming trout. It was a job,
he now says with cold, controlled anger, that was the
start of a descent into a hell in which he feared he was
losing his mind. It would cost him his family, his
future wife, his career and his self-respect as he scored
heroin on the streets to ease his physical and mental
torment.Today, almost 13 years later, Mr Findlay, his
lawyers and a growing body of medical experts are preparing
to go to court to show how a controversial but routinely
applied pesticide in the fish and general farming industry
destroyed his life. They will claim that a ‘five-second
accident’ in which he was doused with a compound of organophosphates,
used to kill sea lice in fish bound for human consumption,
so profoundly physically and mentally altered the former
Glasgow University economics student that his future was
wiped out.
His case, one of the worse
in hundreds if not thousands allegedly affected by organophosphates
(OPs) in the UK, is only the tip of an iceberg of culpability,
say scientists and medics, which successive governments
refuse to acknowledge. Farmers, Gulf War soldiers
and even children who have been given head lice treatment
have all been potential victims of the powerful pesticide
which was first warned about back in the Fifties.
Some opponents even suggest that the pesticide could have
been responsible for BSE in cattle. If successful
in his claim, which could amount to tens of thousands
of pounds, Mr Findlay could open the floodgates to others
who, despite worldwide studies backing their claims, have
been denied any redress against the chemical ind ustry,
government and employees.
Professor Malcolm Hooper,
emeritus professor of medicinal chemistry at the University
of Sunderland and Chief Scientific Advisor to the Gulf
Veterans Association said last week: “I have no doubt
James Findlay has suffered severe damage from his exposure
and he continues to pay a very big price for it in his
personal health. I have met and studied him and
am prepared to go to court on his behalf. James
is a victim of government compromise which states interest
in the subject but cannot afford to acknowledge all the
evidence coming. It all comes down to commerce and
cash and, as far as I’m concerned, the chemical industry
is being protected by government”.
Such backing is wonderful
to hear for a man who spent ten years trying to get an
answer to his problems. But it doesn’t further a
cure. “The medical prognosis is not exactly cheerful”,
said Mr Findlay last week as he sat in his tiny council
house in Inverness, a resigned, wry smile flickering across
his face. “My once very high IQ has been reduced
by neuropsychologists to below average and I appear to
have a form of autism when confronted with facts and figures
and rapid analysis. I already have creeping paralysis
and face total paralysis, further brain deterioration
including dementis, numerous potential cancers, rapid
aging of the cells and, of course, early death.
I live with depression, irratibility, allergies, food
intolerances, chronic pain and fatigue alongside tremors,
panic attacks – you name it. Most painful of all,
I have been told that I am sterile. I will never
have the child or children I’d hoped for. It is
just as well, because all the evidence suggests that if
I did father a child the chances of genetic abnormalities
would be incredibly high. Once I had a life of real
promise. Is it any wonder that I expect someone,
some company, some multinational to apologize and ultimately
to pay for this?”
The accident Mr Findlay
refers to as ‘the end of my world’ happened on May 28,
1990. Already disturbed at the lax conditions he
had found at the Cromarty Salmon Company, he was unhappy
to be told he would have to ‘delouse’ the cages more than
a mile out in the Firth. Given a slight, protective
mask and wearing overalls, he watched as a mix of Aquaguard
SLT, an organophosphate compound, was added to a bucket
of water and he was then shown how to sluice it over the
trout cages moored in the Cromarty Firth. As he
did so, the bucket slipped in his hand and its contents
went all over his head, face, shoulders and upper body.
“I felt an immediate burning sensation and I wretched
the mask off, shoving my head forwa rd to stop anything
running into my mouth. The manager, Brian Shaw,
grabbed me and tried to wash my face with the cage water
which was already contaminated with the compound.
I ran to another part of the farm and washed myself with
fresh water. I was aware I was light-sensitive and
my eyes were burning, my shoulders seemed heavy.
I was disorientated, I felt like I was floating.
I knew I had to get ashore.”
[Graphic: Organophosphates
poison sign – Deadly poison: the danger of working with
organophosphates are well known]
Three-and-a-half hours
after the accident, Mr Findlay was admitted to hospital
20 minutes away in Inverness, where he was treated as
a case of severe OP poisoning and given antidote.
He was sent home after 24 hours’ observation and his boss
gave him the rest of the week off. Despite still
feeling under par, Mr Findlay worked on until other safety
incidents at the farm disturbed him enough to quit before
the end of this three-month contract. Taking up
his fisheries job in the Clyde Basin, in Ayr, he thought
no more about the accident. “It should have been
the start of an amazing part of my life but I was a different
man from the one they hired,” he now says, barely audible.
“I’d travelled the world before finally settling.
I loved meeting new people and being in new situations.
I’d found the job I wanted and yet I couldn’t seem to
make sense of anything around me. I found it hard
to concentrate, even to fill in forms. I was so
irritable that people complained about me, but I didn’t
see it. Instead of relishing what I was doing I
felt as if I had this heavy, heavy weight over me, tired
all the time, really incapable of lifting a foot.
There were complaints about the loss of memory but I didn’t
know what they were talking about.” Over the next
four years he tried to live an ordinary life, meeting
a girl, hoping to marry, whilst battling increasingly
bleak depressions. During that time he visited the
doctor on 33 occasions with a mix of symptoms which were
finally put down to ‘all in the mind’.
For some reason the hospital
report of his poisoning, seen by the Mail on Sunday, was
never transferred to his GP. “It never occurred
to me that what had happened had anything to do with what
was happening to me then,” he says. “I even asked
if I had MS or ME. Relating my family history, it
was decided at some point that because of my parents’
divorce and a pretty unhappy background I was finally
exhibiting symptoms relating to that. It seemed
possible, with no other answers, and I went into myself
– a downward spiral, wondering if that was it. It
was the start of vicious recriminations with my mother
and father which are barely healed to this day. Obviously,
if it were mental, no one was going to give me any pain
relief.” Thinking a geographical change would help,
Mr Findlay and his girlfriend moved to Kinlochbervie in
Sutherland, where he was in charge of all fishing measures
and markets. “I was in the most glorious spot on
earth,” he recalled. “And nothing had changed –
I was worse, blacker, feeling I was being ripped apart,
going down”. The girlfriend left him: “I loved her
dearly, and she me, but she couldn’t put up with the mood
swings and everything else. Who could blame her?”
By now convinced he was
either mad or bad, Mr Findlay lost almost everything.
With his muscles screaming, and painkillers ineffective,
he went quickly to the streets to buy heroin and other
opiates – taking care only to smoke or swallow, not inject.
The drugs gave temporary relief. He re-enrolled
at university in Paisley for an MSc in industry, but quickly
dropped out, unable to cope. He even sought refuge
at a Buddhist monastic centre in the Borders, battling
his addiction as a trainee monk in six-month isolation.
Returning to Inverness, he enrolled in an addiction centre.
Detailing his life, he almost accidental ly mentioned
the incident at the fish farm. “It was as if a light
went on in the counsellor’s eyes”, he says now.
“He asked me more and more questions. Strangely,
24 hours later, a pamphlet was put through the door of
the place I was staying, detailing the symptoms of OP
poisoning. It was like a light going on, I felt
sick, disgusted, you name it. Suddenly, after all
those years, here was a reason for all that had happened
to me”.
Mr Findlay contacted his
local MSP, organophosphate action groups, and signed himself
in to a borders hospital to wean himself off any lingering
addictions. His hospital record detailing the incident
suddenly appeared in his medical files for the first time.
He also began the first steps in suing the fish farm company,
which was dissolved in 1999. “I’ve had one drug
relapse in the last three years,” he admitted. “I
know that every bit of dirt possible will be thrown at
me. But I will argue I turned to drugs only because
there was no other way to ease the pains I lived with
and the mental torment I was put through. Today
I’m on the prescribed opiates no one would give for me
for ten, 11 years. All the tests are there, showing
the level of organophosphates still in my body”.
Facing an uncertain future, James Findlay, could be belligerently
antagonistic as he tells his story. Instead, he
repeatedly apologises for his lapses in concentration,
difficult for a boy who was Highland Schools Debating
Champion, a champion school athlete and rugby player.
He hesitantly talks of his new girlfriend Mandy Spear,
and says: “I feel more than anything the wonderful benefit
of finally knowing that happened to me. For once,
I am not alone”.
Useful Dichlorvos (Aquaguard
or also known as Nuvan) links:
“Insecticide ban amid
cancer fears” (BBC News, 19th April 2002):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1939569.stm
“Ministers act over a
range of insecticides containing dichlorvos” (HSE/DEFRA/DEH/DETR,
19th April 2002):
http://www.hse.gov.uk/press/2002/e02076.htm
“Worker sues fish farm
over testicular cancer link” (Sunday Business Post, 10th
March 2002):
http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2002/03/10/story315882.asp
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/pipermail/seatrout-rev/2002-March/000116.html
“Dichlorvos dossier: salmon
farmers’ toxic time-bomb” (January 2002):
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/pipermail/seatrout-rev/2002-January/000059.html
“Fly spray ban urged as
cancer fears rise” (The Sunday Herald, 20th January 2002):
http://www.iatp.org/foodsec/News/news.cfm?News_ID=1705
“Cancer scare over fly
spray used by millions” (The Daily Mail, 15th December
2001):
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/pipermail/seatrout-rev/2002-January/000058.html
“The horrors of
intensive salmon farming” (The Ecologist, June 2001):
http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m2465/5_31/76285487/p3/article.jhtml?term=
“Cancer rise may be linked
to farm chemicals” (Reuters, 16th October 1998):
http://131.104.232.9/agnet/1998/10-1998/ag-10-16-98-1.txt
“Cancers blamed on land
chemicals” (BBC News, 1st October 1998):
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/184215.stm
“Students paid to eat
organophosphates” (The Guardian, 30th July 1998):
http://www.mad-cow.org/aug98_news.html#ddd
From the dossier on
dichlorvos - decades of delay.....
"In July 2001,
we advised Ministers that there could be a small risk
of cancer from dichlorvos in those people who use it
over prolonged periods and that the scale, supply and
use of products containing dichlorvos should therefore
be revoked as a precautionary measure…The advice to
revoke these products was to protect householders and
other users of dichlorvos from a remote but potentially
serious risk" (Health and Safety Executive press
release, 11th December 2001)
"Dichlorvos is
mutagenic...The Committee felt that it would be prudent
to assume a genotoxic mechanism on the basis of the
available data" (Department of Health, Committee
on Mutagenicity, July 2001)
"(MAFF’s decision
to grant a licence to Nuvan) is one of the most blatant
examples of the government’s hypocrisy about the environment.
The way in which this was announced was a cover up.
To give the impression that this stuff is environmentally
friendly is immoral. If it wasn’t for the fact
that the substance was already being widely used by
fish farmers, I am sure that it would never have been
granted a licence. But as it is, environmental
concerns have been quashed in favour of economic pressures."
(Alison Ross, Marine Conservation Society, in Scotland
on Sunday: August 1989)
"Conservationist
bodies in their role as professional ‘whingers’ have
been bitching about our use of Nuvan against sea lice
for years....Perhaps someone had got round to telling
Mr MacGregor that DDVP, the active ingredient of Nuvan
is impregnated into practically every fly strip hanging
in the kitchens of his supporters....Pending receipt
of our first Nuvan from Ciba Geigy, we actually purchased
vast quantities of fly strips and dangled them in the
water in an attempt to save our fish" (Dr Ted Needham
writing in Fish Farmer: September/October 1988)
“Chemical is a Cancer
Risk to Fish Farm Staff, Say FoE’: The environmental
pressure group claim Health and Safety standards are
being flouted and basic precautions overlooked by fish
farm operators who, they allege, use the highly toxic
chemical illegally. They say that Dichlorvos,
the active ingredient in Nuvan, has been classed by
the US EPA as a potential human carcinogen - a cancer-causing
organism….In their lates newletter, ‘Issues’, FoE list
a number of cases of fish farm workers who have required
hospital treatment…FoE claim Ciba-Geigy have not yet
been issued with a licence, making its use illegal.
In their newsletter the group state: ‘We believe the
trend towards heavier and more frequent applications
of Nuvan will not solve the sea-lice problem but will
put fish farm workers at greater risk’."
(The Press and Journal, 18th July 1988)
"The group insisted
that Nuvan was not intended for use on fish farms and
it was pointed out that leaflets from the manufacturers
Ciba-Geigy, specifically said that the chemical was
dangerous to fish and should not be used in ponds, waterways
or ditches. Among other allegations, it was claimed:
a number of workers had been admitted to hospital with
symptoms of Nuvan poisoning, such as severe nausea,
headaches, dizziness and pupil dilation; some employees
were being denied proper clothing, making the health
risk even greater" (‘Curb on ‘Danger’ Chemical
Urged’: The Scotsman, 18th July 1988)